In hard times they run it seems that the nuclear option is when less beneficial for the English population. So do not quite understand that there are two political parties are in favor of nuclear energy but against nuclear cemeteries. And, man, that does not seem to make much sense, because either we, or are not. And the best metaphor for this nonsense is that I heard the other day a journalist at a radio talk show. Said my colleague, is to be in favor of nuclear energy and against the landfill is like trying to buy a house with no bathroom. And I think that is absolutely right.
to me that the problem lies in the moniker. It is clear, and it is logical that no one wants in its territory a nuclear graveyard or a nuclear waste dump. And this "Centralized Temporary Store" does not convince me, because it's for a torn and tattered. Why not hold a competition of ideas to name this thing? To me, to botepronto, I can think of some names and offer free here et amore "Phosphorescent National Park", "Montgomery Burns ETC" or, now more popular yet, "Parking Homer Simpson."
than anyone doubt that the park was named as call, take some economic relief to the town to house it. Between money direct, indirect, and jobs are created, the case can go from dirty to become hopeful. Although only 500 jobs are generated, and serve to reduce the numbers of unemployed, and whether to work on a nuclear graveyard, because it works. The case is to work on anything.
that was that No. 68, issued by Radio 98.3